Jan 10, 2012; Chicago, IL, USA; Columbus Blue Jackets right wing Rick Nash (61) skates with the puck during the first period against the Chicago Blackhawks at the United Center. Mandatory Credit: Rob Grabowski-US PRESSWIRE

The Rick Nash Sweepstakes


While many have speculated Rick Nash will end up in San Jose and how great for the team that would be, I’m just not buying it and here is why. There is no doubt Rick Nash is a phenomenally talented hockey player. He’s been the top scorer in Columbus since forever and has some seriously elite level skill without a question. However I think what San Jose would give up in exchange is too great.

It is almost certain that Pavelski, Clowe, or Couture would be required as part of any deal for Nash (largely because Wilson has traded away all of the other top forward prospects in Woostah). And that wouldn’t even be the end of the deal as a 2nd or even a 3rd skater may be a part of the deal along with a pick or two. And it’s not that Nash doesn’t covet such a trade, but I think if the Sharks trade away so much of their depth they don’t stand a chance to do much damage in the playoffs. And I also predict that depending on the specific players involved, the Sharks wouldn’t even win 40 games.

If you look at Chicago the year after they won the Cup, what did they do? They traded their 3rd and 4th liners and barely made the playoffs and were a blip on the radar once they got there. And look at teams like LA, Phoenix, St Louis, and New Jersey this year. Yea there are a few big name guys there, but what makes them so difficult to play against is the 3rd and 4th line players that strengthen and enhance everything the top 2 lines do. Plus their team defence is stupid good and very hard working. And then there’s the goaltending which I won’t even get in to. We all know where that’s going.

So ultimately I think the Sharks would be best to stay out of the Nash sweepstakes and try to build more from within. Because the new NHL is a lot about home grown talent and a top to bottom blue collar work ethic than it is about a few big name players dominating. And ultimately, Rick Nash is not the answer to the Sharks equation.

~ Bleeding Teal

Be sure to follow all of your BoT staff on twitter!!! @BladesofTeal @bladesofteal17 @Puckguy14 @KingShark49 @_StephLee_ @gordonronco @BMHo @bluelinebomber

Tags: Featured Popular

  • Kingshark49

    I don’t know if Rick Nash is necessarly the answer either, though it certainly would not hurt to have him. Keep in mind too that the Sharks will not be the only team bidding for his services, and CBJ knows this. However the only way he is in teal next year is that if DW can swing a deal that somehow does not include Couture or Pavelski. I don’t feel CBJ will be willing to take on Marleau though the salaries would be identical, and least not without some other incentative (aka draft picks for the next three or four years). The Sharks will however need to make a move that will get the attention of the roster and the fanbase, which will really be “PO’d” once the Sharks become the only California team without a Cup which now seems likely to happen by this time next week. As much as I hate to say this, the this dubious destinction for the Sharks will well earned and enitrely be their own fault from the top on down thoughout the organization. Honestly, right now the Sharks as they are constructed now will not be a playoff contender next year and are on the throws of becoming the new Calgary and are a team on what may be a serious decline. The Sharks as an organization from ownership on down need to decide what type of franchise they are going to be. I like DW, but you can only fail so many times. Personally I would love to see the Sharks shift some of their philosophy to developing more of their home grown talent. If they are serious about winning a Cup of their own, the organization has a lot of work to do and from the ownership on down this will take a much better commitment than what we have seen. If Anaheim and soon LA having won Cups does not motivate the Sharks, then nothing will. The problem at that point is the entire organization, period.

  • Kingshark49

    I don’t know if Rick Nash is necessarly the answer either, though it certainly would not hurt to have him. Keep in mind too that the Sharks will not be the only team bidding for his services, and CBJ knows this. However the only way he is in teal next year is that if DW can swing a deal that somehow does not include Couture or Pavelski. I don’t feel CBJ will be willing to take on Marleau though the salaries would be identical, and least not without some other incentative (aka draft picks for the next three or four years). The Sharks will however need to make a move that will get the attention of the roster and the fanbase, which will really be “PO’d” once the Sharks become the only California team without a Cup which now seems likely to happen by this time next week. As much as I hate to say this, the this dubious destinction for the Sharks will be well earned, deserved and enitrely be their own fault from the top on down thoughout the organization without exception. Honestly, right now the Sharks as they are constructed now will not be a playoff contender next year and are on the throws of becoming the new Calgary and are a team on what may be a serious decline. The Sharks as an organization from ownership on down need to decide what type of franchise they are going to be. I like DW, but you can only fail so many times. Personally I would love to see the Sharks shift some of their philosophy to developing more of their home grown talent. If they are serious about winning a Cup of their own, the organization has a lot of work to do and from the ownership on down this will take a much better commitment than what we have seen. If Anaheim and soon LA having won Cups does not motivate the Sharks, then nothing will. The problem at that point is the entire organization, period.

  • Kingshark49

    I don’t know if Rick Nash is necessarly the answer either, though it certainly would not hurt to have him. Keep in mind too that the Sharks will not be the only team bidding for his services, and CBJ knows this. However the only way he is in teal next year is that if DW can swing a deal that somehow does not include Couture or Pavelski. I don’t feel CBJ will be willing to take on Marleau though the salaries would be identical, and least not without some other incentative (aka draft picks for the next three or four years). The Sharks will however need to make a move that will get the attention of the roster and the fanbase, which will really be “PO’d” once the Sharks become the only California team without a Cup which now seems likely to happen by this time next week. As much as I hate to say this, the this dubious destinction for the Sharks will be well earned, deserved and enitrely be their own fault from the top on down thoughout the organization without exception. Honestly, right now the Sharks as they are constructed now will not be a playoff contender next year and are on the throws of becoming the new Calgary and are a team on what may be a serious decline unless some hard line changes are made which rejuvinate the team and franchise. The Sharks as an organization from ownership on down need to decide what type of franchise they are going to be. I like DW, but you can only fail so many times. Personally I would love to see the Sharks shift some of their philosophy to developing more of their home grown talent. If they are serious about winning a Cup of their own, the organization has a lot of work to do and from the ownership on down as this will take a much stronger commitment than what we have seen. If Anaheim and soon LA having won Cups does not motivate the Sharks, then nothing will. The problem at that point becomes the entire organization, period.