Feb 28, 2013; San Jose, CA, USA; San Jose Sharks center Joe Thornton (19) takes a breather during a timeout in the third period of the game against the Detroit Red Wings at HP Pavilion. The Detroit Red Wings defeated the San Jose Sharks 2-1 in a shootout. Mandatory Credit: Ed Szczepanski-USA TODAY Sports

The San Jose Sharks most stellar start in franchise history has now long come to an end. With only two months of regular season games left, and a losing streak that has far overstayed its welcome, the Sharks are finding themselves in an uphill battle to the top of the pacific division, and more importantly, to a seat in the Stanley Cup Playoffs. While the Sharks have long been acknowledged to have one of the top lines in the West, the presence of a rapidly closing window of opportunity feels stronger than ever, as points are not coming any easier and the team’s core players are not getting any younger.

In their 22 years of existence, the Sharks have made the playoffs roughly 70 percent of the time. Since 2003, when Doug Wilson took over as GM, the Sharks have made the playoffs every single season; making it safe to boast that year-after-year Wilson has built a playoff-type team. Yet they have always fallen short of achieving the final goal. Looking at key players, such as, Joe Thornton and Patrick Marleau, both 33-years-old, poses a question of how many more chances do the Sharks current core players have to hoist that all too elusive cup? It also asks if a roster rebuilding is in the near future.

It is important to note that Marleau has had a huge impact in the start of the season and is the team’s leading scorer at 12 goals and 6 assists and trails second to Thornton in points who leads the team with 22 points, 18 assists, and 4 goals. However, in “goals per game” the Sharks are ranked 27th overall; an alarming seat since the Sharks have traditionally been known for their power play. So while the key guys are getting points on the board, it still has not been enough to stay ahead of the competition. A notable change this season has been the increased depth in defense and a strong penalty kill. But even with a penalty kill in the NHL top five, and strong defensive coverage, scoring has been a problem.

Both Wilson and coach Todd McLellan have mentioned the need to stop waiting for plays to develop and to quickly get more shots on net. After the last Detroit Red Wings game, Wilson stated a strong example of this was the two 2-on-1 rushes led by Marleau and Thornton that did not result in a shot on net. In both situations, when carrying the puck, both players chose to pass the puck rather than take a shot. Wilson explained that this shooting-oriented mindset the coaching staff is championing “doesn’t mean we’re going to take your creativity away, but you do want to add the reality. These are things you need to do. You don’t want to dummy down your game, but you do have to understand this is what works.”

Other critical players, including Martin Havlat, Ryane Clowe, Douglas Murray, and Dan Boyle, are all within the age of 30 – 36. Thus far Havlat has had three goals and three assists, far less than what’s expected of the dynamic left winger. And while defensemen Boyle also has captured three goals, right winger Clowe has yet to score a goal. In the western conference, two teams that are doing very well with very different core ages are the Chicago Blackhawks and the Vancouver Canucks. The Blackhawks are a young team with their 24-year-old captain Jonathan Toews, and 24-year-old winger Patrick Kane, serving as two core players. The Hawks have had a milestone year, setting franchise and NHL records and thus far have defeated the Sharks in all three games played. Kane has led the team with most points at 26 points, 11 goals, and 15 assists. They also have 26-year-old Dave Bolland on defense who has garnered a reputation as the shutdown guy; and the 28-year-old goalie, Corey Crawford, has also been exceptional.

On the other hand, there are the Vancouver Canucks, also a division leader but with veteran core players primarily focused around the Sedin twins, Henrik and Daniel Sedin. Both 32-years-old, this top line is only one year the junior of the Thornton-Marleau line. Daniel Sedin has had 21 points, similar to that of Thornton, except that Daniel Sedin has four more goals than Thornton. Henrik Sedin trails his brother with 18 points, with majority of the points coming from assists. And those assists are going to veteran players Kevin Bieksa and Alex Burrows, both 31-years-old, each with five goals. Finally, 33-year-old goalie Roberto Luongo has been the team’s best goaltender thus far and has taken the team to the Stanley Cup Finals. Thus veteran based teams, like the Canucks, also achieve the same success as young teams; leaving unanswered the age old question of which is more important, the speed and agility of a younger player or the experience and aptitude of a veteran player?

Though the Sharks core may be in their thirties, there are a number of young key players the team can rebuild on. This includes, 23-year-old, Logan Couture, the team’s second highest goal scorer at eight goals, but it closely followed by another key player, Joe Pavelski, who is at seven goals and nine assists. At 28-years-old, Pavelski has played on the top line with Thornton and Marleau, and is possibly the most talked about in correlation to discussions of the Sharks rebuilding. On the defensive front, there is Brent Burns, 27-years-old, and Marc-Edouard Vlasic, 25-years-old. While Vlasic has had one goal and three assist, Burns has been out most of the season with an undisclosed injury. The development of these players could further strengthen the existing core, but that development needs to happen soon.

May 1, 2011; San Jose, CA, USA; San Jose Sharks defenseman Dan Boyle (22) checks Detroit Red Wings left wing Johan Franzen (93) during the third period of game two of the western conference semifinals of the 2011 Stanley Cup playoffs at HP Pavilion. San Jose defeated Detroit 2-1. Mandatory Credit: Jason O. Watson-USA TODAY Sports

The two best pieces I’ve seen on potential amnesty buyouts for the Sharks are from Fear the Fin and The Hockey Writers.  Both suggest, either in photo form or downright speculation, that Dan Boyle is a candidate for buy out.  So is he the Sharks’ best candidate for an amnesty buy out?

No.  Here’re 5 reasons why the Sharks should hold onto Boyle:

1) The Sharks don’t need the cap space.  They’re fine for next year, and Boyle’s contract is only through 2013/2014.

2) Boyle’s offensive prodction has slowed each of the past 3 years, and people think he’s developed into a defensive liability.  LIES!  His point total was down by 2 points and he was a strong +10 last season.  Maybe most importantly he is a minute eater: the guy logged over 25 minutes of ice time.

3) He’s one of the strongest voices in the locker room.  Before Thornton was rightfully named captain, there was speculation that #22 would be the next one wearing the C for our boys in Teal.  For a team that needs that extra push come playoff time, Boyle can be a strong alternate captain for Big Joe to lean on.

4) He has playoff experience and is one of the only players on the current roster to have won a Stanley Cup already (Burish, Niemi, Stuart).

5) I have an autographed authentic Dan Boyle Jersey.  I met him at the Tank one day, he couldn’t have been nicer, and took time away from his young family to sign some autographs for fans until everyone had his name on their gear.  Good dude.

Please, Doug, leave Dan here.  Let’s see what these old dogs can get done in 2013.

~BB

Be sure to follow all of your BoT staff on twitter!!!  

@KingShark49 @bluelineboomer @81Bayer

Blades of Teal: Tape to tape “WITH THE PASS” of expert analysis on San Jose Sharks, Worcester Sharks, and San Francisco Bulls hockey

September 12, 2012; New York, NY, USA; NHLPA executive director Don Fehr speaks during a press conference at the 2012 NHLPA summer player meetings at the Marriott Marquis. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-US PRESSWIRE

TSN.ca listed the basic points in the deal here, and there are a few things to note.  The time for a player becoming a UFA has increased.  The length of rookie contracts has declined.  Both mean players can be paid lower for longer.  Both mean that older players will be phased out of the league faster in lieu of younger, cheaper talent.  Aside from that, though, this deal looks to be pretty good.  There has been a LOT of complaining on message boards that this is just a big PR move by the league, the guys over at Pension Plan Puppets have outlined this here.  Really, at it’s base, the NHL is trying to get their revenue share more inline with other leagues, and that makes some sense.

The NHL and NHLPA will meet on Thursday in Toronto to discuss the NHL’s latest proposal in detail.  Bob McKenzie at TSN says the offer wasn’t met with a great deal of hope by the NHLPA, but hopefully we’ll have some good news later that day.

~BB

Tweet me @bluelineboomer

Blades of Teal ~ The Final Word On Sharks Hockey.