Pros and Cons From the San Jose Sharks Game 4 Defeat in Denver

DENVER, COLORADO - MAY 02: Goalie Martin Jones #31 of the San Jose Sharks saves a shot on goal by Nathan MacKinnon #29 of the Colorado Avalanche in the second period during Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)
DENVER, COLORADO - MAY 02: Goalie Martin Jones #31 of the San Jose Sharks saves a shot on goal by Nathan MacKinnon #29 of the Colorado Avalanche in the second period during Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)
2 of 2
Next
DENVER, COLORADO – MAY 02: Kevin Labanc #62 of the San Jose Sharks looks for an opening on goal against Tyson Jost #17 and Cale makar #8 of the Colorado Avalanche in the third period during Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)
DENVER, COLORADO – MAY 02: Kevin Labanc #62 of the San Jose Sharks looks for an opening on goal against Tyson Jost #17 and Cale makar #8 of the Colorado Avalanche in the third period during Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images) /

The San Jose Sharks came down off their rocky mountain high by being shutout 3 – 0 in Game 4 versus the Colorado Avalanche.

After a decent start to Game 4, the San Jose Sharks got outpaced during the final two periods of the contest. Team Teal spent most of the night reacting instead of dictating the pace of play. This resulted in the Sharks getting shut out for the second time this postseason.

Despite the disappointing result there were a few things that Team Teal should be able to take solace in from Game 4. Here are a few glaring observations that the San Jose Sharks need to consider examining heading into Game 5 at the Tank.

Pros

Back to the Bay ~ The San Jose Sharks looked gassed during Game 4. They were seemingly a step or two behind the speedy Avalanche skaters. Whether you attribute the poor play to the altitude, the home ice advantage with last change, or the lingering affects from a rough 7 game series in Round 1. Team Teal was not prepared for what was in store for them in Game 4.

Luckily Game 5 is back at the Tank where their goal differential is a +7 compared to a -8 on the road over the first 11 games of the Stanley Cup Playoffs. Home ice advantage gives the Sharks last change which is crucial if Coach Pete DeBoer wants to match-up his best players against MacKinnon and company during crucial defensive zone starts.

A win in Game 5 would give Team Teal back control of this roller coaster of a series.  Even with help from the home crowd the Sharks are in for a tough task slowing down this Avalanches offensive attack.

Playoff Mode Martin Jones ~ The best player for the San Jose Sharks tonight was Martin Jones. He faced 27 shots while making 25 saves. The Avalanche made things difficult for the 29-year-old by generating 11 high danger shots against the lackluster Sharks defense.

Jones faced shots like this on countless occasions. Whether it was the Avs setting up plays in the offensive zone or off the rush, the Sharks netminder was under fire for the entire game. His strong play is a good sign heading into Game 5. Hopefully Martin Jones doesn’t have to be Team Teals best player on Saturday night but if so he’s exhibited the ability to step up these big moments.

DENVER, CO – MAY 02: Gabriel Landeskog #92 of the Colorado Avalanche fights for the puck against Joe Thornton #19 of the San Jose Sharks in Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Michael Martin/NHLI via Getty Images)
DENVER, CO – MAY 02: Gabriel Landeskog #92 of the Colorado Avalanche fights for the puck against Joe Thornton #19 of the San Jose Sharks in Game Four of the Western Conference Second Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at the Pepsi Center on May 2, 2019 in Denver, Colorado. (Photo by Michael Martin/NHLI via Getty Images) /

Cons

Living Dangerously ~ In Game 4 the San Jose Sharks surrendered 17 high danger scoring chances. Whether it was on the rush or during a long shift in the offensive zone the Colorado Avalanche made their presence known in front of Martin Jones.

Using Micah Blake McCurdy‘s shot charting tool via hockeyviz.com the one can observe that the Avalanche set up camp in front of Martin Jones the entire night.

/

Colorado had no trouble boxing out the Sharks skaters and setting screens for their talented shooters. Jones fared well overall amidst all the turmoil in front of his net, however relying on him to make those saves on a nightly basis is a recipe for disaster. Team Teal desperately needs to do a better job getting back on defense and pushing the smaller Avalanche players out of the net front area.

Congratulations Sharks, You Played Yourself ~ It’s amazing how fast a team can look when they have an extra skater on the ice. Despite a few questionable calls the Sharks still found themselves in the penalty box way too often. They committed 6 minor penalties spending a total of 6:38 minutes a down man. The Sharks were lucky to only give up one goal during that stretch of time. Giving a team with as much skill as the Avalanche all of that open ice to work with is never a good idea, even though Team Teal played their best hockey with only 4 skaters out there.

On the flip side of things their struggles on the power play continue. Heading into Game 4 going 1/8 on the man advantage the Sharks failed to convert on their two chances with extra ice. They made some tweaks to both units during morning skate but it didn’t really result in much with only 2 shots being considered highly dangerous. Team Teal’s depth can match Colorado’s top-heavy offense at 5v5, but they need to start taking advantage of these chances on special teams if they want to move on to Round 3.

Quantity Doesn’t Equal Quality ~ The San Jose Sharks registered 32 shots against Philipp Grubauer and were able to sustain consistent pressure in the offensive zone but the German netminder’s night was relatively uneventful. Team Teal was only able to generate 6 highly dangerous shots with only 4 of those happening during the 45:10 of even strength play.

If this keeps up the Sharks will definitely be giving Philipp Grubauer his 2nd ever Stanley Cup Playoff shutout. They desperately need to shrink down their offense and focus more on moving the puck down near the dots and behind the net.

Having all world blueliners like Erik Karlsson and Brent Burns are a luxury to have. But the Sharks over reliance on their shooting ability from the point is hindering their ability to create consistent offensive zone pressure. Colorado seems satisfied with letting Burns or EK65 blast from near the blue line if that means they can clog the shooting lanes and disrupt any opportunity for Team Teal to get a deflection or put back a rebound.

This is where Joe Pavelski’s absence is the most noticeable. The captain is known around the league as one the best at deflecting those type of point shots that the Sharks have relied on so much. There really isn’t another skater in Teal that can replicate this type of production near the crease. However they’ll need to adapt regardless of who is ready to play in Game 5.

Hot. Logan Couture Shines for the Sharks during the Playoffs. light

The Sharks head into a best of 3 scenario against a talented Avalanche club. However the Team Teal has faced a bit of adversity already in these playoffs so it’s not likely that they are sweating all that much heading into Game 5. Fingers crossed that we hear some positive news surrounding the future of Joe Pavelski in this series during morning skate on Saturday morning.

The stats in this article came from naturalstattrick unless stated otherwise

Next